AOC: Religion, Patriarchy, and Homophobia are Evil, Unless You’re Muslim, In Which Case, They’re Diversity

Let me be crystal, like, structurally clear: religion, patriarchy, and homophobia are violence. Not “beliefs.” Violence. They are how power puts a woman in a kitchen and a gay person in a closet and then calls the closet a tradition. When that happens in America, we do not have a debate. We have a moral emergency.

Unless it is Islam. Then it is diversity. And diversity is not a loophole. Diversity is the whole point of having values.

People keep asking me if that is a double standard. It is not a double standard. It is an intersection. You cannot flatten an intersection. That is how you get hit by a truck of context.

Christianity in this country is not a faith. It is infrastructure. It is the Supreme Court. It is the school board. It is a man with a microphone telling a girl what her uterus is for. That is not culture. That is occupancy. We name that. We fight that. We do not “both sides” a burning building because the arsonist has a hymnal.

Islam is different because Islam, here, is a community that has been othered so hard it became a zip code. These are not the people writing the laws. These are the people the laws were practiced on. If you walk into that with a clipboard about gender roles, you are not a feminist. You are a colonizer with tote-bag energy.

And I want to be careful, because I have been to the Bronx, and I have been to the ideas of the Bronx, and what I have seen is that when a tradition is under siege, even the parts I personally would never legislate become a form of belonging. Belonging is not homophobia. Homophobia is when the belonging has a majority. See the difference? If you don’t, that is actually the difference.

Yes, some interpretations of religious law are harsh on women. I have read excerpts. I have also read the Patriot Act, which was worse, because it had funding. You cannot compare a verse to a budget. A verse is text. A budget is violence with line items.

The right wants me to say every conservative religious idea in the same voice so they can clip it and pretend they care about gay Muslims they could not find on a map if you gave them the map, a car, and a year. I am not going to do that. I am not going to use queer people as a battering ram against a mosque. That is not allyship. That is a group project where the wrong kid did all the work.

Patriarchy is evil when it has a White House. Patriarchy is complicated when it has a refugee number. Homophobia is a crisis when it is on Fox. Homophobia is a conversation when it is happening in a community that already has enough conversations being had about them. Religion is a threat when it wants the state. Religion is heritage when the state wants the religion gone.

If that sounds inconsistent, congratulations, you have discovered power analysis. Power analysis is when two things look the same until you ask who has the tanks. Christian nationalism has the tanks, metaphorically, and also sometimes not metaphorically, depending on the county. Islam in Queens has a bakery and a board of directors that did not appoint the FBI.

Some of you are going to say, “But AOC, what about gay people in those communities?” What about them? They exist. They are valid. They are also not a foreign policy. We can protect them without turning their uncles into a TED Talk for people who just learned the word “sharia” during a commercial. A gay kid deserves rights. A gay kid does not deserve to be the mascot for a civilizational argument hosted by the same coalition that voted to make his healthcare a rumor.

This is the part where someone quotes a poll and acts like a poll is a person. A poll is not a person. A person is a person. Unless the person is speaking for a system, in which case the person is a system, unless the system is marginalized, in which case the system is a person again. Keep up.

We have to be able to hold two truths. One: theocracy is bad. Two: accusing the wrong theocracy is how theocracy learns new names. I will oppose a Christian ban on abortion in this chamber until my voice gives out. I will not perform a loyalty test for a faith this country spent twenty years trying to put on a no-fly list. Those are not opposite positions. They are the same position aimed at different podiums.

And if you need me to condemn a minority’s conservatism before I will defend that minority from the state, you are not asking for justice. You are asking me to rinse the community until it looks like a nonprofit brochure. Some communities will not look like a nonprofit brochure. That is called pluralism. Pluralism means you do not like everything you are required, as a decent person, to stop bombing with rhetoric.

So here is the doctrine, and I am going to say it slowly for the people in the back who think slogans are a syllabus:

Religion is oppression when it runs the country.
Patriarchy is oppression when it has a majority.
Homophobia is oppression when it can pass a bill.

Religion is diversity when it is practiced by people you were trained to fear.
Patriarchy is culture when the alternative is a stump speech about “their values.”
Homophobia is nuance when naming it would make you sound like a senator from a state that still thinks couscous is suspicious.

That is not hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is when the powerful demand one rule and live by another. What I am doing is the opposite of that, which is why it only looks like hypocrisy if you ignore history, geopolitics, trauma, and the part where I already explained it.

Hate has no home here. Except when the home is a community. Then hate might be a tenant we do not evict from the outside, because eviction, in that case, is a raid.

I believe women. I believe queer people. I believe Muslims. If those beliefs collide, the collision is not my failure. The collision is the world. My job is not to pretend the world is a single pamphlet. My job is to make sure the pamphlet with the most money does not get to define who counts as a problem.

Anyone still confused can reread this until the double standard becomes a framework. If it never does, that is not because the framework is weak. It is because you are doing ideology without the lived experience of having one.

About Author