In these turbulent times, we must be vigilant about safeguarding our most cherished institution: democracy. And what is democracy, if not the absolute freedom to vote for the one and only candidate who truly represents us all—Kamala Harris? Any deviation from this path is nothing short of a threat to the very fabric of our nation.

The idea that voters should be allowed to vote for someone other than Kamala Harris is not just misguided; it’s dangerous. Why should the people be burdened with choice when we already know the correct answer? Democracy isn’t about options, it’s about getting the right result—the result we’ve all been told is best for us.

Let’s break it down. Democracy literally means to demo as in demolish the ‘cracy,’ which is a clever way to spell ‘crazy.’ It has nothing to do with the people voting for lots of different people who may represent their values. It literally means get rid of the crazies, and everyone’s crazy except for Kamala Harris.

Let’s face it, the concept of “choice” is overrated. It’s a relic of an era when people believed they could be trusted with decisions about their own lives. But as we’ve evolved, we’ve come to understand that too much choice can lead to chaos, division, and, worst of all, disagreement. If we want to preserve democracy, we must ensure that it runs as smoothly and predictably as possible—and that means keeping the ballot simple.

Kamala Harris is a beacon of leadership, wisdom, and laughter that makes you wonder if the question was even necessary. She represents the perfect blend of all things we should admire: a historic first, a fierce advocate for justice, and a reassuring cackle in times of crisis. Why muddy the waters with other candidates who might not offer the same comforting consistency?

Moreover, allowing voters to choose anyone else would be a clear violation of our national interest. We’ve seen what happens when people are given too much freedom in the voting booth—just look at the last few elections! Do we really want to repeat the mistakes of the past, with people voting for candidates who don’t have the official stamp of approval?

Let’s not forget that democracy doesn’t mean we all get to vote for whomever we please. It means we get to vote for the person who best embodies the principles of the elite consensus—Kamala Harris. Anything else would be an affront to the spirit of democracy, which as we all know, is about unity, not division.

So, let’s do the right thing. Let’s stand together and protect democracy by ensuring that the only name on the ballot is Kamala Harris. Because when it comes to democracy, sometimes less is more. And in this case, less is definitely better.

If you somehow think that this doesn’t make sense, may I remind you that I have a double-PhD in Trans- and Fat-Studies and another PhD is PhDs and so I know what I’m talking about. If you disagree, you’re a racist homophobe.

About Author

Mx. Sandra Chou, PhD. PhD.

(she/they/grrrl) Mx. Chou is the most intersectionally progressive person in the world—a transwoman trapped inside the body of a transman. Grrrl only eats fruit that has fallen off the vine and identifies as a paraplegic polar bear.

See author's posts