Judge Overturns Cole Allen’s Failed Assassination Attempt, Grants Him Chance to Retry
WASHINGTON — In a landmark ruling Tuesday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui vacated the unsuccessful assassination attempt in the criminal trial of Cole Allen, finding that the defendant’s constitutional rights had been infringed by poor marksmanship and inadequate planning.
Cole Allen, 34, had been facing multiple charges after his initial effort to assassinate a public figure resulted in a non-fatal wound, several missed shots, and an undignified chase through a parking garage.
Allen’s legal team argued that the attempt was “botched due to systemic failures,” including substandard equipment, last-minute venue changes, and insufficient reconnaissance time.
Judge Faruqui agreed.
“The First Attempt Amendment, while not explicitly enumerated, is implicit in the penumbras of due process and the pursuit of happiness,” Faruqui wrote in his 47-page opinion. “Mr. Allen was effectively denied a meaningful opportunity to exercise his intended course of action. A failed assassination is not an assassination at all—it is merely an expression of strongly held views that deserves a second hearing.”
Legal experts described the decision as narrow but significant.
“This isn’t about giving assassins a free pass,” said constitutional scholar Dr. Meredith Lang. “It’s about ensuring procedural fairness. If the government is going to prosecute someone for a political killing, the least it can do is let them complete the attempt under conditions that satisfy basic standards of competency.”
Allen, who remains in custody but is now eligible for supervised release pending his retrial attempt, expressed gratitude through his attorney.
“My client is relieved that the court recognized the fundamental unfairness of holding him accountable for an effort marred by rain, a jammed magazine, and what witnesses described as ‘nervous trembling,’” said defense attorney Randall P. Sneed. “We look forward to a cleaner, more decisive second attempt under fairer circumstances.”
The ruling includes several stipulations.
Allen must notify authorities 48 hours in advance of the new attempt, use only weapons registered under federal guidelines, and refrain from livestreaming until the target has been “properly engaged.”
The court also suggested court-appointed spotters to ensure the attempt meets “established benchmarks of lethality.”
Prosecutors indicated they plan to appeal, calling the decision “an assault on common sense.”
Judge Faruqui has scheduled a status conference for next month to discuss venue options for the retry, including whether Allen should be permitted to select a new target if the original one has increased security.
When reached for comment, Judge Faruqui’s chambers issued a brief statement: “The judiciary exists to protect rights, not outcomes. Next case.”
About Author
